Skip to content
cjhaas blog

Basically a place that Chris can post solutions to problems so he can easily find them later

cjhaas blog

Basically a place that Chris can post solutions to problems so he can easily find them later

How to grow a Synology array

Posted on September 14, 2022September 14, 2022 By [email protected]

tl;dr – When adding more drives you can mix-and-match, but when replacing existing you must use a drive at least as big as the largest drive in the array.

In the past whenever I added drives to my Synology the pool and volume automatically grew, however with my most recent purchase this appeared to no longer be true, so what changed?

We recently bought four 14TB drives to replace existing 6TB drives in our main array. As we popped drives out of the main array we decided to recycle them into a backup array which had only 3TB drives in it. After a week of popping and repairing (the backup array was at 82% and couldn’t do a fast repair) the array size wouldn’t change.

We kept checking the RAID Calculator and according to our calculations it should have been at roughly 47TB for SHR however it remained unchanged at 29.1TB. We rebooted, we scrubbed, we updated the OS, we ran S.M.A.R.T, we even swore at it, but nothing would get the array to grow. The Storage Manager showed that we had 6TB drives (or 5.5TB but whatever) so it did recognize them, and as noted, these came from another array so we knew they were working.

But we dug deeper. We double-checked the drive compatibility table and the drives were in fact listed. We checked our model number against maximum volume size and 108TB was listed as the max.

So then we searched. And searched. And searched. “Grow Synology array”. “Synology can’t increase volume size”. “Synology modify allocated size greyed out”.

Synology had an FAQ that seemed perfect:

I added new drives to my Synology NAS, but the available capacity didn’t increase. What can I do?

Nope, can’t increase, it is greyed out.

Expand the Volume Size

Also nope, same reason.

Add Drives to Expand the Storage Pool Capacity

Sounds exactly like what I’m trying to do. (I’m actually wrong, more on this one later.)

How I upgraded my Synology NAS to a bigger disk

Yikes. Almost a decade old and manually running commands against the partition tables. Also includes a bunch of “should do the trick but didn’t work for me” statements.

Adding, extending, and removing Linux disks and partitions in 2019

More recent however not Synology-specific. I did run the fdisk and parted commands for inspection, and they confirmed that 6TB drives were only using 3TB (as far as I could interpret, at least). And if I’m being honest, I did try crossing my fingers and running one of the rescan commands, hoping for magic, but it didn’t fix anything and I didn’t want to push my luck.

So finally I ended up in the forums with a post:

Grow Synology after adding larger drives

One person was curious about the drives and the other person, although they technically answered the question literally, they didn’t really answer the problem or provide anything useful. Granted that this is a free forum filled with community members how are probably answering in their free time, I’m not knocking that. The fact that I got a discussion going fairly fast was great. But coming from SO, when we state a fact we try to back it up with the source of the fact. The same day as I posted my question to Synology I commented on another on SO where I drove the person to more information. Same with the day before. Short and sweet, but still leading them. (It also doesn’t help that a prior post literally said RTM.) But that’s a side problem. Once again, I’m not bashing anyone, I’m grateful for any help I could get.

After getting the technical answer I continued searching and that’s when I finally noticed the text installing additional drives on this page. Yes, that page title is also Add Drives, and I fully acknowledge that I was wrong and I scanned too fast and I was searching for the wrong things.

What I really needed was Replace a Drive.

In that article we get:

If the existing drives are of different sizes, then the replacement drive must be equal to or larger than the largest existing drive. You must replace the smaller drives first to optimize the usage of storage pool capacity. For example, if your SHR storage pool consists of three drives of different sizes (i.e., 4 TB, 3 TB, and 2 TB), then the replacement drive must be at least 4 TB. Replace the 3 TB or 2 TB drives first.

In the past when I had performed this operation I had always been replacing drives in the array with larger drives. Our most recent growth prior to this, however, was to add two 14TB drives since they were super stupid cheap at the time. This meant that for the first time ever I was adding drives that weren’t the largest in the entire array.

I was wrong. I didn’t RTM. I know now. Hopefully you do, too.

Update: Right after posting this I see there is a response in the forums giving me a little bit of closure that states the only fix is to backup and start over. So at least I have the answer I was looking for now.

Synology

Post navigation

Previous post
Next post

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Recent Posts

  • Google open redirect
  • How to use AI to write code
  • Doctrine/Symfony MariaDB DSN connection string
  • Creating a portable copy of pdftotext from source
  • Gravity Forms shortcode getting extra line breaks when used with ACF

Recent Comments

  • jose luis on #2 – VB.Net iTextSharp Tutorial – Add an image to a document
  • Eliezer Castanon on iTextSharp slightly smarter text extraction strategy
  • javad on How to recompress images in a PDF using iTextSharp
  • MANOUS3784 on Flock is awesome
  • Sang on Flock is awesome

Archives

  • June 2026
  • October 2025
  • November 2023
  • September 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • December 2022
  • September 2022
  • April 2022
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • April 2021
  • January 2021
  • October 2020
  • August 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • July 2019
  • May 2019
  • December 2018
  • October 2018
  • July 2018
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • September 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • November 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • January 2013
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • July 2012
  • March 2012
  • January 2012
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • July 2011
  • February 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • June 2010
  • April 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009

Categories

  • Accessibility
  • Advanced Custom Fields
  • Authorize.Net
  • BWP Minify
  • Composer
  • Crappy Google Search Results of the Day
  • CSS
  • Doctrine
  • Drupal
  • Drush
  • Elasticsearch
  • Fun links of the day
  • Google Analytics
  • Gravity Forms
  • HHVM
  • HTML
  • iTextSharp
  • JavaScript
  • Linux
  • mysql
  • nginx
  • Optimization
  • PDF
  • PdfPTable
  • PHP
  • Plugins
  • Ramblings
  • Random things I learned
  • Redis
  • Security
  • simplesamlphp
  • SQL Server
  • SSH
  • SSL/TLS/HTTPS
  • Stack Overflow
  • SVG
  • Symfony
  • Synology
  • Uncategorized
  • Unicode
  • Varnish
  • Vendi Best Practice
  • VIP
  • Weird Google Search Results
  • Windows
  • WordPress
  • WP-CLI

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
©2026 cjhaas blog | WordPress Theme by SuperbThemes