Skip to content
cjhaas blog

Basically a place that Chris can post solutions to problems so he can easily find them later

cjhaas blog

Basically a place that Chris can post solutions to problems so he can easily find them later

I hate Font Awesome like I hate jQuery

Posted on December 7, 2018 By [email protected]

First off, if you don’t know me then you might be offended or enraged by that statement. Please, keep reading.

Font Awesome is a truly great collection of icons that can be easily deployed with a simple CSS or JS include. A ton of work has gone into it to make it as small as possible and they’ve even encouraged use of things like subresource integrity which is just great to see. Font Awesome is truly awesome.

I guess to be fair, I don’t actually hate Font Awesome, I hate that people use it blindly.

Once again, if you don’t know me, I’m a penny pincher when it comes to HTTP requests, DNS lookups and bytes crossing the wire. When someone says “pull the data in with AJAX” I say “can you just inline the data on the server-side in a JS block?” When someone else says “here’s how to do something with jQuery” I’ll always come back with the vanilla JS version. Just load the jQuery from a CDN because the user might have it cached already? Nope, I’d rather host myself. One less DNS lookup and TLS handshake to worry about, not to mention a potential point of failure.

Back to Font Awesome, including it the way that most people blindly use it you’ll end up with a minimum of two calls, one for the CSS and one for one of the font files. But, how I usually see it is that someone wants a Twitter icon, and exclamation mark, and a check mark, which, if you don’t already know actually causes three font files to download! The Twitter logo is part of the brand fonts, the exclamation mark is solid fonts and the check mark is part of the regular fonts. In total you’ve added 150 KB to the page, just for those three icons that could have been inlined for probably 2 or 3 KB (and that’s not counting compression.)

Now, if you don’t care about 150 KB on your initial request, that’s fine, I’m not judging you. But 150 KB for X plus another 100 KB for Y starts to add up over time. And sites never shrink over time, they always grow. Tomorrow or next week or next year you’ll add a new feature which adds another 100 KB for feature Z.

My further hatred of how people use it, and you’ll see this very often in the WordPress world, is that every plugin requests their own copy of Font Awesome, some on version 4, some on version 5, so you end up with multiple downloads of Font Awesome. On a recent site we audited we found 500 KB of Font Awesome data on the home page! That’s half of a megabyte! For icons!

Anyone still reading? Probably not.

I just had to say something, it was bugging me. Font Awesome is a great way to get started for fast designs. It is also a great tool if you have dynamic or unknown data entering your site that you need to support. And further, if you defer or lazy load things you can ease the burden even more. But just don’t use it blindly.

On the off-chance that someone actually reads this I turned comments off because I don’t care, I just wanted to rant.

HTML Ramblings WordPress

Post navigation

Previous post
Next post

Recent Posts

  • Google open redirect
  • How to use AI to write code
  • Doctrine/Symfony MariaDB DSN connection string
  • Creating a portable copy of pdftotext from source
  • Gravity Forms shortcode getting extra line breaks when used with ACF

Recent Comments

  • jose luis on #2 – VB.Net iTextSharp Tutorial – Add an image to a document
  • Eliezer Castanon on iTextSharp slightly smarter text extraction strategy
  • javad on How to recompress images in a PDF using iTextSharp
  • MANOUS3784 on Flock is awesome
  • Sang on Flock is awesome

Archives

  • June 2026
  • October 2025
  • November 2023
  • September 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • December 2022
  • September 2022
  • April 2022
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • April 2021
  • January 2021
  • October 2020
  • August 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • July 2019
  • May 2019
  • December 2018
  • October 2018
  • July 2018
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • September 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • November 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • January 2013
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • July 2012
  • March 2012
  • January 2012
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • July 2011
  • February 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • June 2010
  • April 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009

Categories

  • Accessibility
  • Advanced Custom Fields
  • Authorize.Net
  • BWP Minify
  • Composer
  • Crappy Google Search Results of the Day
  • CSS
  • Doctrine
  • Drupal
  • Drush
  • Elasticsearch
  • Fun links of the day
  • Google Analytics
  • Gravity Forms
  • HHVM
  • HTML
  • iTextSharp
  • JavaScript
  • Linux
  • mysql
  • nginx
  • Optimization
  • PDF
  • PdfPTable
  • PHP
  • Plugins
  • Ramblings
  • Random things I learned
  • Redis
  • Security
  • simplesamlphp
  • SQL Server
  • SSH
  • SSL/TLS/HTTPS
  • Stack Overflow
  • SVG
  • Symfony
  • Synology
  • Uncategorized
  • Unicode
  • Varnish
  • Vendi Best Practice
  • VIP
  • Weird Google Search Results
  • Windows
  • WordPress
  • WP-CLI

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
©2026 cjhaas blog | WordPress Theme by SuperbThemes